Landing: Part V, Landing Roll
Alexander Burton, CFI
Pacific Rim Aviation Academy Inc.
Pitt Meadows Regional
Airport
“You got
to be very careful if you don't know where you're going,
because
you might not get there.”
--Yogi
Berra--
As
Wolfgang Langewiesche reminds us, “More airplanes are wrecked during the
landing run than during any other manoeuvre.” (1)
Unfortunately, many pilots seem to operate under the assumption that once
the wheels of the aircraft are in contact with the ground, the landing
problem has ended. Nothing could be farther from the truth particularly when
flying a conventional gear aircraft.
While
tricycle gear aircraft are more resistant to ground looping and many other
negative results of poor handling, they are still subject to serious,
potential difficulties once the wheels have made contact with the landing
surface. This is not the moment to take a holiday from piloting. Here we
are, after all, at that perilous zone: the edge of the air.
At the
moment of touchdown, we find ourselves in contact with the landing surface;
we are not, however, finished with the flight. The wings still support a
significant portion of the weight of the aircraft, the control
surfaces—aileron, elevator and rudder—are still providing a significant
portion of the directional control, and the aircraft is still in possession
of significant kinetic energy in proportion to its mass and velocity (2).
Our task
now is threefold. We must maintain directional control of the aircraft, we
must direct the transfer of the aircraft’s weight from its wings to its
wheels in a gentle and controlled manner, and we must control the conditions
allowing the aircraft to dissipate its residual kinetic energy.
All of
these tasks must be accomplished before we reach the far end of the
available landing surface.
The two
most common results of failing to maintain control and achieve a safe
landing roll, as portrayed in TSB accident reports, are runway excursions
and runway overruns. Neither is a desirable outcome. These are not words we
ever want to hear or read describing one of our landings.
In a
no-wind or direct headwind situation, our problem is simpler than when we
must deal with crosswinds. However, as most light aircraft pilots will tell
you, it’s a rare event to land with absolutely no crosswind component to the
ambient breeze. For those folks flying light taildragger aircraft, a lunch
customer sneezing on the patio of the airport café can provide sufficient
crosswind to be noticed.
Maintaining directional control during landing roll is critical to the
safety of the flight. Each year we read accident reports involving runway
excursions or runway overruns, cases where pilots have failed to maintain
directional control of their aircraft and have left the runway or landing
surface for greener pastures, or worse, for water-filled ditches. Been
there, done that; exciting, but not so much fun.
The
challenge of maintaining directional control during the landing roll is
increased by such factors as a rough or uneven surface, water, snow, ice or
debris, crosswinds, too much speed on contact, and the changing dynamics of
control systems as the aircraft slows.
The only
real choice we have concerning the landing surface is whether or not we
choose to set our wheels on it. If we have made that choice, awareness of
the potential difficulties and preparation to respond to those difficulties
can reduce our hazard potential greatly. Surprise is not our friend. An
unobserved badger hole can provide more entertainment than we might have
chosen.
Just
because the wheels have touched the surface, however, we are not committed
to continue with the landing. It may be, for example, an excellent plan, if
the surface turns out to be more challenging than we can handle or feel
comfortable with, to add power and abort the landing rather than carry on
into a marginal or dangerous situation. How important is this particular
landing anyway?
We are not
always as perceptive as we might hope; aborting a landing, even at this last
stage, can save us time, money, embarrassment, or worse.
In
aviation, we are in a constant process of weighing benefit against risk.
What may be an acceptable decision and assumption of risk for an experienced
pilot flying a medivac sortie may not be at all acceptable for you or me out
for a picnic lunch stop on a sunny, Sunday afternoon.
At the
moment our wheels touch, we are still effectively in flight. The wings are
supporting the aircraft and our flight controls allow us to guide it. Keep
flying. As the aircraft slows, lift decreases, and kinetic energy decays; we
are transferring weight from the wings to the wheels and directional control
from our flight controls to our wheel steering systems. We may still require
flight control inputs, particularly in crosswind conditions, but the landing
gear begins assuming greater and greater authority as the weight of the
machine transfers.
With a
tricycle gear aircraft, except in exceptional conditions, we prefer to keep
the nose wheel off the surface as long as practical. Extra drag produced by
the higher angle of attack assists the aircraft dissipate its kinetic energy
gently; keeping the nose wheel off the surface until the aircraft has slowed
helps reduce impact and extends the life of those vulnerable parts that must
support the nose once the aircraft has fully transferred its weight to the
landing gear.
With a
tailwheel aircraft, if we have executed a three point landing, we will
dissipate most of the aircraft’s kinetic energy prior to touchdown. This is
one of the arguments in favour of the three point landing. We have kept the
aircraft flying until its will to fly is pretty much gone. Our task then is
simply to keep the machine aligned with its landing path with rudder input
and, if absolutely required, with brake.
The
critical factor here is to make sure the little beast has had time to get
finished with flight before we let it settle to the earth. Think about
landing a 20-pound spring salmon using 3 pound test line. Patience is a
great virtue.
Once the
wheels have touched, or even moments before, we gently pull the stick full
aft to ensure the tailwheel is firmly in contact with the surface and the
wing is at an angle of attack at or very close to the critical angle of
attack for stall. Any excess lift will simply carry us back into the air
with the whole touchdown process to be done again.
In a wheel
landing, we can make contact with the surface at a higher speed than would
be acceptable with a three point landing. We must keep in mind, however,
that the machine still has quite a bit of fight left in it even though it is
in contact with the ground. At the moment of contact, lower the nose to
reduce the angle of attack and keep flying, keep flying, keep flying. Use
rudder and aileron to help maintain directional control as kinetic energy
decays; use elevator to keep the main gear firmly on the ground.
The prime
argument for using a wheel landing is the higher speed of the aircraft at
ground contact. This gives the flight directional control systems positive
authority during the ground roll until the aircraft has slowed.
As speed
and energy decay, the elevators eventually lose their authority to keep the
tail up and the aircraft will settle to its three point attitude. Remember,
gyroscopic precession resulting from a change in the plane of propeller
rotation will cause the machine to yaw to the right as the tail settles. Be
ready for this event so you will not be surprised and end up, as my friend
Charlie would say, “somewhere out in the rhubarb patch.
Once the
tailwheel has settled to the ground, full back on the stick will keep it
there and directional control will be achieved with use of rudder and, if
required, brake.
The ground
roll portion of the landing is the last and final phase of the process. If
executed with grace and skill, it is a very pretty sight and a confidence
builder for the pilot. Poorly executed, it can become a shambles and result
in some very embarrassing and expensive outcomes.
If you
develop a mindset that the machine is “in flight” from the moment the
tie-downs are cast off until they are once again firmly in place, it may
save you considerable surprise and, perhaps, unnecessary grief.
Focus and
attention on the landing roll is an opportunity to fully enjoy each and
every moment of this delightful experience we call flight.
Notes:
- Langewiesche, Wolfgang,
Stick and Rudder, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, 1944, renewed 1972,
p. 312
- KE = (mass x velocity2)/2
or 1/2 mv2
PRINCIPAL AIR
Main Terminal Chilliwack Airport
2-46244 Airport Road, Chilliwack, B.C. V2P 1A5
Phone: (604) 795-7861 Fax: (604) 795-7867
E-mail
|